Supreme Court sets December 4 mention in fresh housing levy appeal

By

Peter Okiro has asked the Supreme Court to overturn a Court of Appeal ruling that upheld the Affordable Housing Act, 2024. The 1.5 per cent levy stays in place for now, and respondents have 14 days to reply.

Key numbers in the housing levy case
1.5 Levy rate (%)
42 Appeals dismissed
5 Judges on bench
14 Days to respond
Source: Capital FM

The housing levy is back in court. Peter Okiro has filed a petition of appeal at the Supreme Court against the Court of Appeal decision that upheld the Affordable Housing Act, 2024, Capital FM reported. The appeal reopens the debate over whether the 1.5 per cent levy is constitutional.

In directions issued on Wednesday, the Supreme Court ordered Okiro to serve the petition on the respondents by close of business the same day. The respondents then have 14 days from service to file their responses. Okiro will have seven days after that to file a rejoinder, if needed. The case will come up for a virtual mention on December 4 for further directions.

For workers, nothing changes yet. According to Capital FM, the directions do not decide the merits of the appeal and do not suspend the levy. Employees still pay 1.5 per cent of their gross monthly salary, and employers match it. Non-salaried earners pay 1.5 per cent of gross income, subject to the applicable statutory provisions.

The appeal follows a September 25 judgment in which a five-judge Court of Appeal bench dismissed 42 consolidated appeals against the law. The judges found that the levy was a lawful use of the government's taxing powers. They also found that it served a legitimate public purpose. They rejected claims that it violated property rights by making workers fund a programme they might not benefit from. "Taxation enacted through Parliament for a clear public purpose does not violate private property rights," the court said.

The bench also ruled that different collection methods for formal and informal sector workers did not amount to unconstitutional discrimination. The government had argued that Parliament met public participation requirements. It cited nationwide consultations, stakeholder hearings and written and oral submissions.

The fight dates back to November 2023, when the High Court struck down the levy introduced under the Finance Act, 2023. The court found that it lacked an adequate legal framework and discriminated against salaried workers. The government responded with the Affordable Housing Bill, which became law after presidential assent on March 19, 2024. The High Court dismissed new petitions against that law in October 2024, which led to the appeals decided in September.

The levy is a key source of money for President William Ruto's affordable housing programme. Capital FM noted that the new appeal adds legal uncertainty to a programme that depends on continued deductions from workers and employers. No ruling has yet been made on the constitutional questions Okiro has raised.

Zimbabwe Zambia Yemen St Helena United Arab Emirates Uganda Turkey Tunisia Togo Tanzania Syria Swaziland South Sudan Sudan Spain South Africa Somalia Somaliland Sierra Leone Senegal Saudi Arabia São Tomé & Príncipe Rwanda Qatar Portugal Oman Nigeria Niger Namibia Mozambique Morocco Western Sahara Mauritania Malta Mali Malawi Madagascar Libya Liberia Lesotho Lebanon Kuwait Kenya Jordan Italy Israel Palestinian Territories Iraq Iran Guinea-Bissau Guinea Greece Ghana Gambia Gabon France Ethiopia Eritrea Equatorial Guinea Egypt Djibouti N. Cyprus Cyprus Côte d’Ivoire Congo - Kinshasa Congo - Brazzaville Comoros Chad Central African Republic Cameroon Burundi Burkina Faso Botswana Benin Bahrain Angola Algeria Kenya
Kenya

Sources Capital FM, AllAfrica

Back to 12 November